If you're thinking of switching to Sky Q there's one important catch you should know about

Link: => esuwaldan.nnmcloud.ru/d?s=YToyOntzOjc6InJlZmVyZXIiO3M6MzY6Imh0dHA6Ly9iYW5kY2FtcC5jb21fZG93bmxvYWRfcG9zdGVyLyI7czozOiJrZXkiO3M6MjI6IlNreSBxIG1pbmkgYm94IGJyYWNrZXQiO30=


Poor from Sky I said this on day 1 and I feel the same now. The result is perfect reliability and high speed downloads. This item at this price, sold by Amazon.

For example my house has stone walls a meter thick and wifi is limited to the room each device is in, plus a bit of signal that escapes through the door. Sky have said they see 1-2 million Q installs a year being easily achievable. You should try it and you would find out what it is really like.

Answered: Hiding Sky Q box and using remote

Sky also do not recommend the box be placed on its side as it has not been designed to be used this way. Found product factsheets for:- Sky Q 2tb Sky q mini box bracket Sky Q mini 0tb Interesting They do not advise nor mention either lying flat, but without wall mount option I would agree they probably don't think we should. Or mini boxes with satellite inputs. Found product factsheets for:- Sky Q 2tb And Sky Q mini 0tb Interesting They do not advise nor mention either lying flat, but without wall mount option I would agree they probably don't think we should. Or mini boxes with satellite inputs. The whole point of Sky Q is that the minis connect by wifi, they are hardly likely to have mini boxes with satellite inputs as that would defeat the whole design of Sky Q. As for your other questions I doubt anyone on this forum can provide an answer as any given would be pure guesswork. Found product factsheets for:- Sky Q 2tb And Sky Q sky q mini box bracket 0tb Interesting They do not advise nor mention either lying flat, but without wall mount option I would agree they probably don't think we should. Or mini boxes with satellite inputs. The whole point of Sky Q is that the minis connect by wifi, they are hardly likely to have mini boxes with satellite inputs as that would defeat the whole design of Sky Q. As for your other questions I doubt anyone on this forum can provide an answer as any given would be pure guesswork. I guess it's a major selling point. Being able to move them round the house or for some people to be shared with the neighbours I've heard. Minis will never have satellite inputs - that goes against the whole design of Q with a central media server. It's down to heat dissipation - the box is designed to be used flat only. Do that and you'll see why they don't use one. As for your other questions, no one knows. I think it's safe to say not in the near future though. If they were to be happening soon, they'd have been on the roadmap published as part of the last financial results. Minis will never have satellite inputs - that goes against the whole design of Q with a central media server. It's down to heat dissipation - the box is designed to be used flat only. Do that and you'll see why they don't use one. As for your other questions, no one knows. I think it's safe to say not in the near future though. If they were to be happening soon, they'd have been on the roadmap published as part of the last financial results. I think with its thin design it could have given wall mount options and indication lights options on top, it could look very cool wall mounted. I understand as fibre broadband infrastructure gets better that the minis reliability will improve from their current status. Still think though that having option to assign a recording to a user indicated by colour would be an improvement. Or just for the 1-2m Sky Q users. People want to know that Sky are still considering them, or just blindly expecting them all to upgrade. Minis will never have satellite inputs - that goes against the whole design of Q with a central media server. It's down to heat dissipation - the box is designed to be used flat only. Do that and you'll see why they don't use one. As for your other questions, no one knows. I think it's safe to say not in the near future though. If they were to be happening soon, they'd have been on the roadmap published as part of the last financial results. I think with its thin design it could have given wall mount options and indication lights options on top, it could look very cool wall mounted. I understand as fibre broadband sky q mini box bracket gets better that the minis reliability will improve from their current status. Still think though that having option to assign a recording to a user indicated by colour would be an improvement. Or just for the 1-2m Sky Q users. People want to know that Sky are still considering them, or just blindly expecting them all to upgrade. Again, your understanding of this system is laughable. Minis will never have satellite inputs - that goes against the whole design of Q with a central media server. It's down to heat dissipation - the box is designed to be used flat only. Do that and you'll see why they don't use one. As for your other questions, no one knows. I think it's safe to say not in the near future though. If they were to be happening soon, they'd have been on the roadmap published as part of the last financial results. I think with its thin design it could have given wall mount options and indication lights options on top, it could look very cool wall mounted. I understand as fibre broadband infrastructure gets better that the minis reliability will improve from their current status. Still think though that having option to assign a recording to a user indicated by colour would be an improvement. Or just for the 1-2m Sky Q users. People want to know that Sky are still considering them, or just blindly expecting them all to upgrade. So far that makes a grand total of one request for a wall mounted main Q box across the 3 forums I use here, Sky's own and Avforums. Status lights are the easy bit of the design. As Boothy says, you show your complete lack of understanding of the fundamentals of how Q works again. Box to box streaming doesn't even need a broadband connection at all - it relies entirely on the internal network. The roadmap sets out their plans for Q because it's the product which has scope for major development. Equally obviously, they don't have 10 million boxes in a warehouse now. Little factors like availability of engineers affect the rollout speed. Sky have said they see 1-2 million Q installs a year being easily achievable. So their supply chain will be designed to match that. I guess it's a major selling point. Being able to move them round the house or for some people to be shared with the neighbours I've heard. For most people the networking is done easily using wifi. But if you happen to have a house where wifi cannot work well then reliability of the wifi signal is an issue. For example my house has stone walls a meter thick and wifi is limited to the room each device is in, plus a bit of signal that escapes through the door. In my case the solution was to use my ethernet network to connect all devices together, and I disabled wifi entirely in both the main Sky Q box and the mini. The result is perfect reliability and high speed downloads. I guess it's a major selling point. Being able to move them round the house or for some people to be shared with the neighbours I've heard. For most people the networking is done easily using wifi. But if you happen to have a house where wifi cannot work well then reliability of the wifi signal is an issue. For example my house has stone walls a meter thick and wifi is limited to the room each device is in, plus a bit of signal that escapes through the door. In my case the solution was to use my ethernet network to connect all devices together, and I disabled wifi entirely in both the main Sky Q box and the mini. The result is perfect reliability and high speed downloads. Poor from Sky I said this on day 1 and I feel the same now. Too many bad decisions on Sky Q Rushed to market Works fine for me in a 400 year old cottage with a massive brick chimney with stainless steel liner between the Q 2tb box and the mini in the kitchen. It's anything but open plan. As he stated, there are alternatives to WiFi for Q - wired ethernet for one. Sky will install cat 5 cabling where required if wireless simply doesn't work The minis are nothing like the old Multiscreen boxes. They don't have any satellite decoding facilities or card slots, for a start. I guess it's a major selling point. Being able to move them round the house or for some people to be shared with the neighbours I've heard. For most people the networking is done easily using wifi. But if you happen to have a house where wifi cannot work well then reliability of the wifi signal is an issue. For example my house has stone walls a meter thick and wifi is limited to the room each device is in, plus a bit of signal that escapes through the door. In my case the solution was to use my ethernet network to connect all devices together, and I disabled wifi entirely in both the main Sky Q box and the mini. The result is perfect reliability and high speed downloads. Poor from Sky I said this on day 1 and I feel the same now. Too many bad decisions on Sky Q Rushed to market You seem to have got entirely the wrong idea about what Sky Q is. Millions of people are happily using it. You should try it and you would find out what it is really like. I can't see Cisco developing it any further when it's currently fit for purpose. I guess it's a major selling point. Being able to move them round the house or for some people to be shared with the neighbours I've heard. For most people the networking is done easily using wifi. But if you happen to have a house where wifi cannot work well then reliability of the wifi signal is an issue. For example my house has stone walls a meter thick and wifi is limited to the room each device is in, plus a bit of signal that escapes through the door. In my case the solution was to use my ethernet network to connect all devices together, and I disabled wifi entirely in both the main Sky Q box and the mini. The result is perfect reliability and high speed downloads. Poor from Sky I said this on day 1 and I feel the same now. Too many bad decisions on Sky Q Rushed to market You sky q mini box bracket to have got entirely the wrong idea about what Sky Q is. Millions of people are happily using it. You should try it and you would find out what it is really like. I have used it for over a 2 weeks!!. The basics of it are a great idea, the problems are there and Sky didn't see them coming. They did rush it to market, no disputing that. No 2 silvers on 1 account Sky q mini box bracket 1. Planner sharing is the most requested feature by Sky customers. Signal issues are network related and Sky will do whatever is needed from boosters to hardwiring to stop it. Customers just need to actually report them if they want them fixed. It's 4 mini maximum, with 2 in use at any time. Touch remote is fine for most users. I guess it's a major selling point. Being able to move them round the house or for some people to be shared with the neighbours I've heard. For most people the networking is done easily using wifi. But if you happen to have a house where wifi cannot work well then reliability of the wifi signal is an issue. For example my house has stone walls a meter thick and wifi is limited to the room each device is in, plus a bit of signal that escapes through the door. In my case the solution was to use my ethernet network to connect all devices together, and I disabled wifi entirely in both the main Sky Q box and the mini. The result is perfect reliability and high speed downloads. Poor from Sky I said this on day 1 and I feel the same now. Too many bad decisions on Sky Q Rushed to market You seem to have got entirely the wrong idea about what Sky Q is. Millions of people are happily using it. You should try it and you would find out what it is really like. I have used it for over a 2 weeks!!. The basics of it are a great idea, the problems are there and Sky didn't see them coming. They did rush it to market, no disputing that. No 2 silvers on 1 account Only 1. Do I hear you slagging that off?????. The wifi used is the same, with every other device that uses wifi. This sky q mini box bracket far from anything new. Sky Q is using wifi to it's near maximum capabilities and this hasn't really been done before in the domestic environment. Most of the issues occurring are from 3rd party devices anyway so the fact that they are cured so quickly is very impressive, if not a bit frustrating in the mean time. You have absolutely no clue how it's portrayed in the public eye because you are only savvy to tiny pieces of info from forum's that you troll all day long. I speak to and take in that the vast majority enjoy the extra features and generally love sky q mini box bracket new system.

Or just for the 1-2m Sky Q users? This item is not cheap, but it is well made and sturdy and the mini box fits in perfectly. If they were to be happening soon, they'd have been on the roadmap published as part of the last financial results. The result is perfect reliability and high speed downloads. I guess it's a major selling point.